Share Your Story
The origin, the hard lessons, the turning points
"We've been in the throes of this for eight or nine years and the problem that presented itself originally was there's a lot of really capable people out there that could do a job really well, could fit into a team really well based on their EQ and their character and their aptitude. But those people don't get a look in because it's a paper based screening process."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe's origin is rooted in a simple injustice — capable people with strong character, EQ, and aptitude are invisible in a paper-based screening world. The CV filters out the very qualities that matter most in a hire.
"A person that fell victim to this was James, one of the co founders, my brother. And you know, after slogging it through four or five years of university, you come out and you're armed to the teeth with knowledge and you want to apply it, but no one is willing to give you a crack. So yeah, he had law in economics and came out of Otago University and he would have applied for about 70 jobs. And I mean by the end of it he [was] off by the whole process, to be honest. I think he wound up having to do logistics of box packing in a warehouse in South Auckland, like completely not where you thought you'd be after investing all that time and energy and acquiring a tertiary education and he just didn't get a look in."
"He's a good character, he's a go getter. You can talk to anyone, you can sell ice cubes to Eskimos and he's personable and none of that was able to come through in the CV or in a cover letter."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026Co-founder James Farquhar — Johnny's brother — graduated with law and economics from Otago University, applied for 70+ jobs, and ended up packing boxes in a South Auckland warehouse. Despite being a natural communicator ("sell ice cubes to Eskimos"), none of his character or people skills could come through on paper.
"He started to knock on the doors of the heads of that department and just kept on bashing, bashing, bashing. Until one of them responded and said, yep, if you want to pop in tomorrow morning, 9:00am sharp, well, let's have a chat. Which obviously scared the pants off him. He stayed up all night just doing all of the prep work he could and went in there and as we all expected, he smashed it out of the park."
"I don't even think they bothered talking to anybody else. From my recollection of the way it went is there might have been several thousand people that were suitable for this job based on going to market and then internal applications and they gave it to him. And that was a lateral hire, it wasn't a graduate hire. And he went on to become one of their highest performing employees in those first couple of years."
"Paper didn't work for him. Getting in front of someone, being able to talk through your value and [show] your communication skills."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026James bypassed HR and knocked on doors at a top-four bank's FX/global markets team until someone agreed to meet him. He "smashed it out of the park," was hired over potentially thousands of candidates (as a lateral hire, not graduate), and became one of their highest performing employees. The proof point: when paper fails you, being seen changes everything.
"The old adage of 'if only they took five minutes to meet me.' Well, you don't need five minutes, but what you could do — because no one's got five minutes for every candidate — the idea came with how can we start to append videos to the application so that the employers or the recruiters HR can meet more people."
"It was to actually level the playing field and make sure that everyone got their fair chance. So we packaged that up and put it together as a video based job board. Businesses could use videos to promote the job, candidates could submit with videos and that's how we got started."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe started as a video-based job board. The insight was simple: nobody has five minutes for every candidate, but a short video could let employers "meet" more people. The goal was to level the playing field — give every candidate a fair chance to be seen, not just read.
"What we didn't count on, I guess was that you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. So even though we had a solution where you could volunteer a video, 9 out of 10 candidates wouldn't volunteer a video. And then they'd still complain that they didn't get a fair chance to showcase what they were capable of doing."
"We moved forward and modified the solution so that the employers required the video as part of the process. And what do you know, there was little to no pushback from candidates because if the employer said, you've got to go make me a video to actually apply for this job and you really want the job, and that was that."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026When video was optional, 9 out of 10 candidates wouldn't submit one — yet still complained about not getting a fair chance. The breakthrough: making video a requirement. Employer-required video had "little to no pushback" from candidates. The lesson shaped PreviewMe's entire approach: don't make it optional, make it part of the process.
"This is the kicker, we said, you can meet more people in less time. The answer is, or what we found is that they could absolutely meet more people. But consuming an additional one or two minutes of video with every paper based application, which historically would take seven seconds to chip through, meant that it became very time consuming at the front end for the recruiter doing the screening."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe's early promise — "meet more people in less time" — was half right. Employers could meet more people, but adding 1–2 minutes of video to each 7-second paper screen made the process slower, not faster. Without AI to rank and prioritise, video screening was just a bigger pile to get through.
"When we relaunched again, there wasn't any AI. There wasn't a mechanism or a means to rely on computing power to make a recommendation about the most suitable candidates to start the conversation with. And that's really has been a fascinating turn in the journey... Just when we thought that it was going to be shut up shop. After an unsuccessful pivot into online sales, it seems that computing power came to the rescue."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe nearly died. Without AI, video created a bigger bottleneck rather than solving one. The emergence of AI computing power rescued the company — transforming the value proposition from "see more candidates" to "see the right candidates first." AI finally solved the time problem that had plagued PreviewMe since inception.
"Now it's more of a need for a business. We need videos or we need a richer content rich application that tells us that you are not a computer. Which is kind of crazy."
"Everyone that I just mentioned was lazy. Like all the students that were lazy before, they're 10 times lazier now. Go find me a job that's online, pump it through ChatGPT or Claude, give me — go put in a listing, a link to the business and get ChatGPT to curate a cover letter for the position and update your resume without trying to lie too much."
"If everyone's applying for a law job, Russell McVeigh and they all studied law, all came from a New Zealand university. I could tell you that the spread of authenticity is going to be very skinny for anyone applying for it."
"I feel sorry for recruiters. I never thought I'd say that out loud but I felt sorry for candidates at the start. I feel sorry for recruiters now."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026The problem has flipped. Originally PreviewMe helped candidates be seen. Now it helps businesses verify candidates are real. AI-generated applications have made every candidate look the same on paper — "the spread of authenticity is very skinny." What started as a candidate fairness problem is now a recruiter survival problem.
"It was so traumatic that it's just such a relief now to know that people are using the system, people are applying for jobs. It is constantly being used. The volume's not high right now just because we've relaunched, but there is still volume. And I don't hear a peep, I don't hear a squeak."
"From all of that, from breaking toes on rocks all those years, we now have built a platform which is like, over the years we've acquired a lot of business intelligence. The flow is clean, the flow is robust, the messaging is clear."
"It took us eight years, but we got to a point where we're not awake until the early hours of the morning. Sweating about a job that's going to be created. Sweating about a customer's experience. We're ticking all those boxes and we're covering everything off. We've done it."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026After eight years of "breaking toes on rocks," PreviewMe's platform is rock-solid. The flow is clean, robust, and reliable. Zero user complaints. The team no longer loses sleep over platform stability.
"For the businesses, let a really tailored SLM screening assistant that we've dubbed SASS be treated like an extension of their existing team to do pre screening of all of the candidates documents and audio and video as it comes in to make the recruiters lives easier."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026SASS (SLM Screening Assistant System) is PreviewMe's purpose-built AI screening agent. Positioned as "a digital teammate" — an extension of the recruiter's existing team — SASS evaluates all candidate content (documents, audio, video) against hiring criteria and numerically ranks candidates by suitability.
"We are on a features printing, we're building features out at the moment that it quantum leaps forward in terms of the value add for businesses and the product itself."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026With the platform stable, PreviewMe is now shipping features rapidly — each representing a significant leap in value for businesses. The foundation is solid enough to build on without fear of breaking existing functionality.
"I reckon I was doing 18 hour days responding to vicious hate mail about the substandard quality of the video creation process, of the application process, how it wrecked all these kids lives and all of their good work had gone to waste. Their dream job with say a law firm was completely fucked all because of our software."
"I was getting hundreds and hundreds of messages. We had a live chat channel... And just, it just got me so down. And so every time my job went live I get PTSD."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe's early technology execution was poor. Johnny spent 18-hour days responding to hundreds of furious messages from candidates whose job applications had been ruined by platform failures. The trauma was so severe that Johnny developed PTSD around new job launches. The lesson: technology must be bulletproof before scaling, especially when people's livelihoods are at stake.
"There was a part of me that thought... maybe this is where PreviewMe might actually start to add some real value because there's going to be less jobs out there and more people applying for them. So volumes are going to spike... And I couldn't. We couldn't have been more wrong."
"There were more jobs than ever before with no one that wanted to fill them... they were paying more for someone to work less who was not the right person just to have someone."
"We got up to 100 or so customers on board that were paying in some way, shape or form, which again is like, it's a milestone for a business. But then the video became a barrier to people applying."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe anticipated COVID would drive application volumes up. The opposite happened — an extreme candidate-led market emerged. Employers couldn't fill roles, candidates had all the leverage, and video requirements became a barrier. Despite reaching ~100 paying customers, the market fundamentally rejected video screening during this period.
"We looked at what we had and what we had been doing internally is creating short videos to help us sell PreviewMe, which is helping us get a lot of meetings... We found that we were getting really good engagement with our PreviewMe as a sales tool."
"The failure was we didn't offer a solution that was able to pinpoint with a high degree of certainty the dollar value impact of having it... as soon as it became seen as a nice to have, not a must have, then it was just discontinued."
"The business failure is that the sales pivot was a failure, but it kept us alive for a little bit longer, kept us relevant."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026When recruitment stalled, PreviewMe pivoted to sales video outreach — personalised icebreaker videos for LinkedIn and email. The concept worked (engagement was strong), but the team couldn't prove dollar-value ROI. It was a "nice to have, not a must have." The pivot failed commercially but kept PreviewMe alive long enough for AI to arrive and rescue the core recruitment proposition.
"What's now inspiring us or driving us to keep on or to work on PreviewMe... would be to make sure that real people are getting a look in for real jobs."
"There are real people out there that do really want a job, not just having a bot on autopilot. And there are people out there that are far more suited to the job, to jobs than others. And only that assessment can be made with the introduction of some audio visual content as part of the application process."
Johnny Farquhar, SPEAK Session, February 19, 2026PreviewMe's driving motivation has evolved from "help candidates be seen" to "make sure real people get a look in for real jobs." In a world where bots auto-apply on candidates' behalf, video/audio content is the only reliable way to verify authenticity and assess genuine suitability.